skip to main |
skip to sidebar
I've always thought of myself as an issues voter. I don't have any one issue that determines how I vote; my vote is shaped by the constellation of issues I consider to be most important in a given election cycle. Or so I thought. It took this election year for me to realize that I'm a values voter.
I care how candidates treat people. I care how they conduct their campaigns. I believe that the behavior we see from a candidate during the campaign indicates how they will be as President. And that matters to me.
Fortunately, my issues and my values have lined up. Not perfectly, but close enough. I don't require perfection. But I have to wonder what I'll do if an election comes when they do clash. Which way will I vote then? I'm not really sure. I do know that if my issues leaned me towards Republican I would be facing that choice this year.
I have been horrified by the tone, words, and actions of the McCain campaign. It seems like a lifetime ago that I cheered for him winning the Republican primaries. I believed that it would lead to a presidential campaign that would focus on the issues instead of engaging in Swift Boat tactics. I also believed that it would lead to an election where I could be happy whichever way it went. Okay, happy might be too strong. I disagree with McCain on a number of the issues, but I believed him to be a man of integrity. I can live with wrong-headed policies if the person has integrity. There is room for hope as long as a person has integrity. I really thought I could relax this election. Instead, I'm losing sleep agonizing about the outcome because the John McCain I thought I knew and trusted is gone.
But it isn't just McCain. Across the country the Republicans are engaging in despicable tactics. Vicious attack ads and robocalls, repeated attempts at voter suppression; it's like the whole party has lost its soul. If I preferred to vote Republican I would be in despair. How can people who claim to value morality justify acting this way? How can people who value morality continue to vote Republican? All I can say is that a person would have to have to define morality very narrowly.
Personally, my sense of morality cannot accept the complete absence of morality and integrity that I am witnessing in both this and past elections. And if it continues, it will be a long time before I feel I can vote Republican. I definitely will not be voting for McCain. Well, their loss is the Democrats', and Obama's, gain.
Meanwhile, the agonizing wait for November 4 continues.
Tell me. Where is the real John McCain?
I found this by far McCain's most disturbing performance in a debate. It was like he drank a potion that changed him from McCain to McNasty. Another chance to talk substance, and instead he spent most of his time either attempting to terraform Obama's plans to suit his own needs or else engaging in character assassination. When McCain won the Republican nomination, I never thought his campaign would look like this. The man I respected has disappeared.
And Obama? The fire has dimmed a bit. But that's fine with me. I much prefer the solid, steady performance I'm seeing from him now. It bodes well for an Obama presidency. I also find it amusing that at a debate between a Democrat and a Republican, the talk of sacrifice and personal responsibility came from the Democrat.
Obama must have found it extremely frustrating to have his positions repeatedly twisted beyond recognition by McCain. Unlike McCain, however, he remained calm and composed. McCain looked like he was in pain most of the debate. At least that's how I interpret that grimace masquerading as a smile. If this is the best McCain can do in a confrontational situation, I truly do not want him representing my country to the world.
McCain seemed to have taken a page out of Palin's debate manual this round, minus the humor. He ignored question after question to talk about his pet themes. Worse, instead of engaging in a substantive debate, McCain dismissed a number of profound statements from Obama with cracks about Obama's eloquence. I figure McCain must not have had anything worthwhile to say about his own plans. That might be what worries me the most.
I did not watch the debate live. I intended to catch CNN's replay at 5:00pm (+8 GMT) but it got preempted for not exactly breaking news. So there I was at midnight, brain starting to shut down, watching the debate. I can't claim to have caught everything, but there were some things that left a definite impression. And the longest lasting impression? Tones of voice.
The contrast was startling. One voice was calm and confident. The other voice? Insistent, attempted chummy, but mostly condescending. As a child, I never liked it when adults used that talking-to-a-child voice. I find it irritates me even more as an adult. It makes me feel like my intelligence is being called into question. Or that someone is trying to soften me up to ask for a loan or favor. Anyway, as far as I was concerned things did not bode well for McCain.
But on to content.
McCain wants to buy up the bad mortgages from the lenders and then renegotiate the terms with the homeowners. So he was hitting me up for a loan!
But seriously, other than talking about himself and bashing Obama, that was about as specific as McCain got. When he was talking about what he would do as president, it was mostly in generalities. Energy independence. Fix the economy. Solve Social Security. Broad sweeps of the brush. Trouble is, I'm interested in the details and once again I didn't get them from McCain. He still seems to think that it's enough to talk about his record. He keeps pointing us to the past. But I don't live in the past.
Obama talked about investing in clean energy technology, which would not only benefit the environment but would also create jobs. He explained why the bailout was needed by the average American and not just by Wall Street. Oh, he did his share of not quite answering the question. And he did his share of bashing McCain. But he didn't stick to campaign rhetoric. Obama talked about his plans for our country in a tangible way. When he talked about the economy, he clearly was not simply reacting to the current crisis. Rather, he presented a plan with both short term and long term implications. I kind of like the idea of a president who's looking forward.
In light of what we've seen from him the past month, I found McCain's closing words devastatingly ironic. "Times are tough. We need a steady hand at the tiller." And I agree. Obama has my vote.
What can I say, I love Joe Biden! I love him even when he sticks both feet in his mouth. But I wanted him to do well in the debate. What I did not want was for Biden to treat Palin like McCain treated Obama. To my relief, Biden clearly took her seriously. He interacted with her as an adversary. And while this might sound negative, it is a mark of equality. I wish Palin had given Biden the respect he gave her. The nudge nudge wink wink treatment got old fast.
What also got old was Palin's repeated and blatant refusal to answer a number of the questions. Once or twice I can accept. It wouldn't exactly be the first time I heard a candidate evade a question to promote their talking points. But in this case it quickly became obvious that there were a number of subjects about which Palin could not engage in discourse. Subjects that, personally, I consider quite important.
I also consider it important to come away with clear impressions of their plans for the country. Biden gave me a tangible vision for our country. Palin gave me rhetoric and emotionally charged buzzwords.
As much as this bothered me, I found something that bothered me even more. I didn't notice it right away. It was more like an aftertaste from the debate. The farther away I got from the debate, the more it tugged at me. And then it hit me. Palin had patronized me. I know folksy; I grew up with folksy. Palin hadn't been folksy. She had been condescending. I don't want to be winked at. I want to be treated with respect. Biden treated us respectfully. He honored our intelligence. And finally, in a moment of incredible vulnerability, Biden gave of himself to the voters. Palin gave us a snow job.
I'm not sure who frustrates me more; Pelosi and her poorly timed comments about the Bush Administration, the Republicans who try and claim this was sufficient cause to vote against the bill, or the constituents who refuse to see the interconnected nature of our economy.
Personally, I don't think the executives of the companies being rescued should be allowed to keep their jobs. Two weeks pay and a pink slip sounds about right. And yes, I want this as much for my own desire to see blood flow as that it would seem to make sense. I get why the average person does not want to the the multi-millionaires bailed out.
But I also get that I don't exist in financial isolation. It doesn't matter that I've never bought stock or that I don't have a mortgage; if these institutions go down I'm gonna get hurt. So no matter that a part of me would love to see Wall Street crash and burn, I want Congress to pass this imperfect piece of Legislation.
What I don't get is why so many people can't or won't see that they cannot take down Wall Street without taking down themselves. Our economy is too intertwined to indulge ourselves in such acts of self-gratification.
Posts
